Commonwealth v. Patrick Gordon · Docket 2677CR00083

The INV-83 Smoke Device and the Patrick Gordon Case (Docket 2677CR00083)

The INV-83 is a reusable smoke canister designed for hobbyists by the YouTube creator Invention Incarnate. Its maker publishes a notice to law enforcement describing why it cannot function as an explosive or incendiary device. This page reproduces that notice and says what is and is not known about its connection to the charges in Essex County Superior Court.

Disclosure. The INV-83 was designed by Invention Incarnate, who also maintains this site. The statements about the device below are the maker’s own. No court or agency has ruled on them in this case.

What the device is

The INV-83 is a reloadable metal canister that emits coloured or white smoke when a smoke composition inside it is ignited. The product sheet describes a vented aluminum body, a spring-and-striker fuze with a pin and spoon, and a choice of two valves [Exhibit 6].

Exhibit 6

Product sheet titled INV-83 Reloadable Smoke Device with a photograph of a black vented canister and a block of text headed Warning, Law Enforcement Notice, followed by a list of kit contents. The text is reproduced on this page.
INV-83 Reloadable Smoke Device, product notice to law enforcement. Published by Invention Incarnate.

What the maker’s notice says

The product sheet carries a block of text headed Warning – Law Enforcement Notice. It says the canister is engineered exclusively for smoke-generating compositions and lists six design features that, it says, deliberately prevent use as an explosive, destructive, or incendiary device:

Design features listed in the notice, quoted
FeatureStated effect
Intentionally vented bodyrelieves pressure and emits smoke; cannot build sufficient pressure for fragmentation
Threaded sections separate at approximately 30 psiengineered mechanical weak point to prevent containment of high-pressure events
High-temperature rubber isolation valvephysically separates internal combustion zone from external combustible materials
Aluminum body melts at 660°Cincapable of containing thermite or any reaction exceeding ~1200°C
Ignition system is spark-based, instantaneous, and not gaslesscreates immediate, high-risk premature initiation hazard if high explosives are present
Open-system architectureno sealed pressure vessel exists

The notice continues:

“This device cannot be readily converted into an explosive, destructive, or incendiary device without major redesign and fabrication. Any attempt to load this canister with explosive compositions, high explosives, thermite, incendiary mixtures, or other prohibited materials will result in immediate catastrophic failure of the device, most likely producing incomplete reaction, premature initiation, and/or operator injury rather than a functional explosive/incendiary effect.”

“This product complies with current ATF classification requirements for smoke devices and is NOT regulated as an explosive under 27 CFR § 555.”

“Presence of this canister alone does not constitute evidence of an explosive device or destructive device under federal law. Possession of this smoke device in unaltered condition is lawful under federal law when possessed by civilians. All users must comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes regarding pyrotechnics and smoke devices.”

What the kit contains, and what it does not

According to the same sheet, the kit includes one modified fuze, a spring, striker, axle, pin and spoon, the vented canister, a silicone flutter valve for terephthalic-acid-based smoke mixes, and a steel valve for higher-temperature mixes. It lists as required and not included: small pistol primers, visco fuse, and smoke composition [Exhibit 6].

That list is relevant to one fact in the case. The sales record for Mr. Gordon’s visit to a New Hampshire gun shop on December 18, 2025 shows four boxes of small pistol primers [Exhibit 2].

How this relates to the charges

Two of the ten indicted counts concern chemicals: possession of an incendiary material (count 9) and manufacturing fireworks without a license (count 10). See the charges.

Labels legible in the Attorney General’s photograph of seized items include terephthalic acid, potassium nitrate and smoke dye [Exhibit 3]. Invention Incarnate states that these are components of the chemical kits sold under his brand for the smoke compositions he has published, which are based on terephthalic acid and derived from the U.S. military’s M83 training-smoke formula, and that Mr. Gordon bought those kits.

The Commonwealth’s probable-cause-for-arrest statement lists 43 items it says were found in the residence (statement, pp. 6–7). Among them are terephthalic acid (items 1 and 19), cellulose acetate (item 27), red and blue smoke dye (items 24 and 25), and 400 Number 100 primers (item 39). The statement introduces the list as items that alone or in combination could be used to make a destructive or incendiary device or substance. It does not mention smoke compositions or an INV-83 canister, and the list is confined to chemicals, fuse, igniters and primers.

About Invention Incarnate

Invention Incarnate is a YouTube creator and an expert in smoke compositions and ignition systems. He teaches both subjects as an instructor for the Western Pyrotechnic Association.

An instructor in an orange shirt and cap stands at the front of a tent classroom holding a small component, speaking to students seated at tables.
Invention Incarnate teaching a seminar at a Western Pyrotechnic Association event.

His published smoke compositions start from the M83, the U.S. military’s terephthalic-acid training smoke. He reports that over two years of development he increased the smoke output of the M83 formula by 91 percent by replacing its polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) binder with cellulose acetate.

Invention Incarnate does not sell smoke compositions or chemicals. Under white-label agreements, independent pyrotechnic supply companies sell chemical kits under the Invention Incarnate brand, and buyers mix the published formulas themselves.

Invention Incarnate maintains this site and supports Mr. Gordon’s defense. Readers should weigh that interest, which is why every statement here that rests on his account says so.

What is not known